Intelligence Agencies Create Terrorist Plots and Patsies, Then Foil the Terrorist Plots They Created

Are intelligence agencies such as the CIA, FBI, MI6, and GCSB keeping us safe from all of the dangerous terrorists worldwide, or is there something else going on behind the scenes and we the public are being cleverly duped into being afraid of invisible bogey men that only exist because the intelligence agencies created them?

I know that sounds utterly ridiculous and surely could not possibly be true, right? Wrong! It is well documented that intelligence agencies create terror plots and then bust the terror plots they created. Sometimes their plans involve allowing attacks to actually go ahead. Take the London bombings of 7/7 and the 1993 World Trade Centre bombings as examples.

On February 26, 1993, a 1,200-pound bomb in a van exploded in the parking garage beneath the World Trade Center. This was the most destructive terrorist attack carried out on U.S. soil up to that time, killing six people, injuring more than a thousand, and causing half a billion dollars in damage. If the van had been parked a few feet closer to one of the pillars, it could have collapsed an entire tower of the Trade Center, killing tens of thousands.

In 2012 the New York Times reported: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.

THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.

FBI's History of Handing "Terror Suspects" Live Explosives:
In late September 2011, AFP reported that a man was charged with "planning to fly explosive-packed, remote controlled airplanes into the Pentagon and the Capitol in Washington." In its report, "US man charged with Pentagon bomb plot," AFP stated: During the alleged plot, undercover FBI agents posed as accomplices who supplied Ferdaus with one remote-controlled plane, C4 explosives, and small arms that he allegedly envisioned using in a simultaneous ground assault in Washington.

However, ''the public was never in danger from the explosive devices, which were controlled by undercover FBI employees,'' the FBI said.

In November 2010, a similar "plot" was engineered, then "disrupted," also by the FBI - this time in Portland, Oregon. The so-called "Christmas Tree Bomber" attempted to remote detonate a van he believed was filled with explosives, provided by the FBI, before being arrested during a Christmas tree lighting ceremony at Pioneer Courthhouse Square. The FBI's official statement regarding the incident revealed that FBI agents had handled, even detonated live explosives with the entrapped suspect at Lincoln County Park in the lead up to the final failed bombing.

Why Governments and Private Contractors are Always the Top Suspects in Any Terror Plot

The London 7/7 Mock Terror Drill: What Relationship to the Real Time Terror Attacks?
A fictional “scenario” of multiple bomb attacks on London’s underground took place at exactly the same time as the bomb attack on July 7, 2005.

Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, a private firm on contract to the London Metropolitan Police, described in a BBC interview how he had organized and conducted the anti-terror drill, on behalf of an unnamed business client.
The fictional scenario was based on simultaneous bombs going off at exactly the same time at the underground stations where the real attacks were occurring:

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don’t want to reveal their name but they’re listening and they’ll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they’d met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.
(BBC Radio Interview, 7 July 2005)

Intelligence agencies and private contractors running terrorism drills at the exact same locations and times that actual live terrorist attacks manifest is actually a very common event.

DHS Admits Boston Training Drill Involving Backpack Explosives Planned Months Before Marathon

The Department of Homeland Security has gone public with an admission that an exercise was planned months before the Boston Marathon bombings that involved backpacks being used to detonate explosives by rogue terrorists.
According to the DHS documents acquired by the Boston Globe, the agents were planning on conducting training exercises centered around a fictitious terrorist group called ‘Free America Citizens’, a group that would plant backpacks full of explosives around Boston that the detectives would be forced to track down. Ultimately, of course, this ended up happening at the Boston Marathon itself with precise accuracy. The Globe report reads that “the city was hit with a real terrorist attack executed in a frighteningly similar fashion.”

And the DHS isn’t denying that the training exercise manifested itself at the Boston Marathon, as detailed in the back-end article on the Boston Globe that I discovered while browsing the news.
The exercise, labeled as “Operation Urban Shield,” was funded by a $200,000 Homeland Security grant. It was planned months before the Boston Marathon, and it was scheduled to ‘take place’ in official capacity this weekend, according to the sources. But the exercise admission lends further credence to the ignored eyewitness account of bomb sniffing dogs and bomb squads running a training exercise during the morning of the Boston Marathon. Was this training exercise part of Operation Urban Shield?

Terror Drills on 9/11


Despite claims that the United States could have “never imagined” such an attack as those seen on Sept 11, countless government insiders have come forward over the years to reveal that the events of 9/11 could have been stopped.
Among them, multiple personnel operating within the national security state have helped expose key pieces of information buried after the tragic events in 2001. Here are just 3 high level intelligence operatives who exposed 9/11 government foreknowledge.

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer – Operation Able Danger
Former senior intelligence officer Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer attempted to inform the government about several Al Qaeda operatives, including alleged lead hijacker Mohammed Atta, during Operation Able Danger.
“I had no intention of joining the ranks of ‘whistle blowers,’” Shaffer said. “When I made my disclosure to the 9/11 commission regarding the existence of a pre 9/11 offensive counter-terrorism operation that had discovered several of the 9/11 terrorists a full year before the 9/11 attacks my intention was to simply tell the truth, and fulfill my oath of office.”

FBI Translator Sibel Edmonds – US Working with Bin Laden Up Until 9/11 Attacks
Former FBI wiretap translator Sibel Edmonds, who had  top-secret access to NSA intercepts, revealed in 2004 that the FBI had ignored foreknowledge that specifically included plans by terrorists to use airliners as weapons.
“We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or July of 2001. There was that much information available,” Edmonds said. “There was specific information about use of airplanes, that an attack was on the way two or three months beforehand and that several people were already in the country by May of 2001. They should’ve alerted the people to the threat we’re facing.”

Former NSA Senior Executive Thomas Drake – NSA Could Have “Undoubtedly” Stopped 9/11
Former NSA senior executive turned whistleblower Thomas Drake, who helped expose several unconstitutional domestic surveillance programs in 2005, has said repeatedly that the NSA “undoubtedly” could have stopped the 9/11 attacks.
“The NSA had critical intelligence about Al Qaeda and associated movements in particular that had never been properly shared outside of NSA,” Drake said in a recent interview. “They simply did not share critical intelligence although they had it.”

Operation Gladio, Secret for over 40 years, Gladio is a NATO-backed network of armed soldiers inside the nations of Europe which bypasses the control of nation governments. Ostensibly intended for use only in case of a Soviet invasion, Gladio has in fact carried out a string of false flag terror attacks. In 1990, the European parliament called for national political investigations, but most national governments have chosen not to investigate it.

The secret Gladio army, as then Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti revealed, was well armed. The equipment
provided by the CIA was buried in 139 hiding spots across the country in forests, meadows and even under churches and cemeteries. According to the explanations of Andreotti the Gladio caches included 'portable arms, ammunition, explosives, hand grenades, knives and daggers, 60 mm mortars, several 57 mm recoilless rifles, sniper rifles, radio transmitters, binoculars and various tools'. Andreotti's sensational testimony did not only lead to an outcry concerning the corruption of the government and the CIA among the press and the population, but also to a hunt for the secret arms caches.

So with all this fear mongering that corrupt liar Prime Minister John Key is currently pushing on New Zealand with his mates in the media, it is useful to take a look back on past terrorist attacks and foiled plots that have happened around the world in the last few decades and remember that governments and intelligence agencies conduct a very large amount of terrorism worldwide and then attempt to blame it on invisible enemies to terrify the unwitting public into sacrificing freedoms and civil liberties, thereby giving their governments extraordinary powers over their daily lives.

This is most likely what John Key is attempting to pull off here in New Zealand right now. John Key needs to convince the New Zealand public that we are in great danger so he can destroy our privacy and freedoms and give the government sweeping powers to invade our privacy.

History shows that surveillance states use these types of powers to crush political dissent more than they use them to actually defeat terrorists or actual enemies of the people. Why have Western security agencies developed such an unprecedented capacity to spy on their own domestic populations? Since the 2008 economic crash, security agencies have increasingly spied on political activists, especially environmental groups, on behalf of corporate interests.

This activity is linked to the last decade of US defence planning, which has been increasingly concerned by the risk of civil unrest at home triggered by catastrophic events linked to climate change, energy shocks or economic crisis - or all three.

The big worry now is that the CIA or some similar organisation is actively cultivating a bogus terrorist plot here in New Zealand that will miraculously be foiled or executed just before John Key and his gang of thugs in parliament pass sweeping new anti-terror laws.

This scenario is very likely given the history of such activities world wide. We need to remain extremely vigilant given we have a gang of nasty criminal thugs running our government right now.

The manufacturing of bogus terror plots and attacks keeps the intelligence agency budgets swelling and provides the perfect tools to convince the unwitting public into giving up freedoms and privacy to protect themselves from the enemies that are actually their own governments.