Silence About Vaccine Deaths In Media Due To The Confidential Contracts With The Vaccine Manufacturers

THE FLU CASE
I am a Swedish general practioner working in Belgium, and quite involved in this issue, as together with three citizens and another GP we advised the Belgian Government last Friday in court that this is a disguised pharmaceutical trial on human subjects, with real risks involved.

I put in two comments on the story (see below), that are quite relevant in the context that the Swedish Newspapers have seemingly stopped reporting the intermediary results of this disguised pharmaceutical trial.

If you can read French, you will discover at http://www.lepoint2.com/sons/pdf/vaccin-H1N1%20medias.pdf that the maker of PandemRix, that is used in Sweden, passed a secret contract, the same in every European country, which specified a "Green List" of what the government MAY communicate (hardly anything!) and the "Red List" of what may absolutely NOT be made public, like intermediary results of the side effects that appear in the studies of the controversial squalene (and thiomersal) adjuvantated PandemRix until they have been sanitized by Glaxo Smith Kline researchers, and published by GSK themselves.

These contracts also confirm what was announced in Sweden in October, that these pandemic vaccines where actually ordered already back in 2006: there was a standing order to foresee a vaccination for large parts of the population IF the WHO would declare a PANDEMIC of degree 6. When the "New-Type" A/H1N1 appeared, and it started spreading to other continents, the WHO changed their definition of grade 6 pandemic by dropping the criteria that it should be highly deadly. Thus, the government discovered that it’s signed standing orders were passed simply to combat a new (designer!) strain of flu that may or may not become more or less lethal than the common Influenza A or B flu.

This has allowed GSK to do a large scale tolerance experiment of their specialy formulated AVIAN-flu vaccine "Pre-PandRix" paid for by the governments, where doctors are recruited for a large scale pharmaco-vigilance study, without being paid as researchers, and patients receive government propaganda to sign up "to protect the weak in our society", while de facto subjecting themselves to be guinea pigs in this "H1N1-dry-run" study for the future benefit of registering GSK's AVIAN flu vaccine "Pre-PandRix".

If you are to receive the "Pandremix" against the benign “new-type” H1N1-flu this season, we recommend that you first learn about the possible side effects, as GSK asked their own employees to sign an "informed consent form" before receiving the vaccine: see for ex: http://www.asanat.org/Declaration_of_Free_and_Informed_Consent.pdf

Best regards,

Dr Beeth www.asanat.org

(See also my other comment below )

By the way: Yesterday, Sunday, I appeared on a TV debate show together with an H1N1-veterinarian vaccine developer at GSK who was very proud to announce that 8000 pregnant women had already been vaccinated in Sweden with NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER! See middle of this episode: http://www.rtbf.be/tv/revoir/detail_mise-au-point?uid=38287439668&idshed... . That is the “GSK-sanitized” version of the truth. What is the real situation in Sweden, and what LONG TERM sicknesses will these women/children develop from the experimental vaccine trial?

These contracts were labeled "secret defense":
Dr Eric Beeth 2009-11-02 15:58:33
These contracts were labeled "secret defense", and we learn a lot about "who is the boss, Government, or Big Pharma?" by reading them! You can still access them here: Keep them on your computer, they are historic!

http://www.lepoint2.com/sons/pdf/vaccin-H1N1%20medias.pdf

What I found mind boggling, as a doctor, is to discover Glaxo Smith Kline's "Green List" of what the government MAY communicate (hardly anything!) and the "Red List" of what may absolutely NOT be made public, like intermediary results of the side effects that appear in the studies of the controversial squalene (and thiomersal) adjuvantated PandemRix until they have been sanitized by GSK, and published by GSK themselves.

These contracts also confirm what was announced in Sweden in October, that these pandemic vaccines where actually ordered already back in 2006: there was a standing order forsee a vaccination for large parts of the population IF the WHO would declare a PANDEMIC of degree 6. When the "New-Type" A/H1N1 appeared, and it started spreading to other continents, the WHO changed their definition of grade 6 pandemic by droping the criteria that it should be highly deadly. Thus, the government signed standing orders were passed simply to combat a new (designer!) strain of flu that may or may not become more or less lethal than the common Influenza A or B flu.

This has allowed GSK to do a large scale tolerance experiment of their "Pre-PandRix" paid for by the governments, where doctors are recruited for a large scale pharmaco-vigilance study, without being paid as researchers, and patients receive government propaganda to sign up "to protect the weak in our society", while de facto subjecting themselves to be guinea pigs in this "dry-run" study for the benefit of registering GSK's "Pre-PandRix".

If you are to receive the "Pandremix" this season, we recommend that you first learn about the possible side effects, as GSK asked their own employees to sign an "informed consent form" before receiving the vaccine: see for ex: http://www.asanat.org/Declaration_of_Free_and_Informed_Consent.pdf

Best regards,

Dr Beeth

Precision
Dr Eric Beeth 2009-11-02 16:37:08
When re-reading my post, I realize that some may become confused about Pre-PandRix or PandemRix.

Pre-PandRix received a temporary and conditional Market Authorization back in 2008 to combat H5N1 bird-flu which is indeed highly deadly, if it should become transmissible to humans. The condition was (1) presence of a grade 6 pandemic, and (2) a bi-weekly intensive post market release farmaco-vigilance study of the side effects, as they appear. When the H1N1 level 6 pandemic was declared, (thanks to an arbitrary decision to drop the criteria of high mortality rate) GSK saw a window of opportunity to use its current adjuvans formulation that was designed for the very high risk bird-flu vaccine (which does not work without a heavy duty adjuvans)to mix with the split-virus H1N1 antigen (which is not a highly deadly virus, and does NOT need adjuvans to be effective: just a double dose of antigen is sufficient). This is how the very clumsily formulated "PandemRix" was born, complete with the identical two component military style 10 dose formulation bottles containing a zest of thiomersal, which increases its toxicity, and makes an "in tempore" mixing with the squalene emulsion necessary. It must be thrown away 12 hours within mixing; otherwise it becomes even more toxic. Even though thiomersal is a considered a neuro-toxin of the past in European countries, and squalene has never been tried out on children, pregnant women, or people suffering from diverse (auto-immune) diseases, the EMEA granted the same conditional market authorization for the formulation against the benign H1N1 (which does not require adjutants or thiomersal) as it had done for the much more dangerous pandemic situation of a bird-flu. The untested vaccines themselves, whether PandemRix or Pre-PandRix, are potentially just as dangerous - time will tell us, thanks to the volunteers who were willing to try out this experimental vaccine. If you or friends are willing to help the advancement of science with this endeavor, please first make sure to sign your informed consent form:

http://www.asanat.org/Declaration_of_Free_and_Informed_Consent.pdf

Best regards,

Dr Beeth